http://science.discovery.com/tv/build-bigger/episodes/episodes.html
I came across what was my favorite episode of this show on the Science Channel. Broadcast before the City Center in Las Vegas was finished, the show takes a look at the different construction going on for the entire development. So complicated and so many people involved. What a great episode.
Civil Development in Los Angeles is the blog title. Â We will still be pretty focused on the engineering sector in Southern California, especially anything related to greening or LEED for a project. Â I will have a few non engineering related posts such as the ATI bios fix as I would like to post some useful information that can still be used in this sector.
We have recently been approved to start work on a new project in Downtown LA.  This will be our second larger LEED project.  I will be very interested in seeing how this ties into the new California environmental codes, called CalGreen.  A little more info on CalGreen located at http://civildevelopmentgroup.com/blog/rx4
Britain’s Misuse Of The Title “Engineer” Is Detrimental To Profession, BAE Chief Says.
The Daily Telegraph (UK) (3/1) reported on Dick Olver, the chairman of BAE, who said in a recent interview, “Britain suffers from a language problem in that the word ‘engineer’ is applied to a lot of different people who do a range of jobs. … Professional engineers need to take ownership of the brand and keep it for themselves.” The ability for those of “limited technical qualifications” to call themselves engineers, according to Olver, “makes it more difficult to attract people to study engineering at university and enter the profession.” Â http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/047d4d8a-24ba-11df-8be0-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1
Dick Oliver is publicly mentioning how the term “engineer” should not be loosely thrown around. Â I can’t believe how many times I hear the word engineer to describe just about any job description. Â Most people already know the joke about a janitor calling themselves a sanitation engineer. Â This phrase is also very common in the software industry where a programmer with a Computer Science degree will have a job title of engineer. Â I wonder if one day the Engineering community will take back their brand name and not let anyone use it.
Trying to find the engineering gold at the end of the government rainbow is very unnecessary in these internet days. Â The gold for my company are the standards that a particular municipality enforces. Â Some websites have full standards that are hard to find. Â Other websites have partial standards hiding in the depths of their pages. Â Others even have hidden documents that can only be found when using the GOOG to search the site. Â Enforceable and changing over time, standards should be easy to navigate from the main public works webpages. Â Anything not on the site should clearly explain what standards they do want used. Â Will I ever be able to find engineering gold at the end of the rainbow?
The hoarding of engineering information between colleagues is a big problem. An intervention must occur as no one benefits to keeping knowledge to themselves. Sure you may be intentionally trying to standout from others by being one of those that has mastered their particular discipline. But that is where your knowledge may dead end. Why not teach another person how to do your discipline, and that person in return can give their point of view in relation to what they know. Not only will you help that person understand your work better, you may be able to improve upon your own work. Now both of you have exponentially become more valuable.
In Civil Engineering a designer will generally take up one discipline such as street design. Â The problem with only knowing street design is that the street designer doesn’t always know how to match up to the grading portion. Â Then comes the issue matching the grading to the storm drain system to the street. Â Suddenly a project can snowball into lots of tiny issues that are very hard to fix. Â Now if the three designers used in this example all understood what the other was doing, then a project will run much smoother with a more efficient design.
I have seen issues where the grader does not understand how to match their grading into the street causing lots of potential stormwater flooding issues. Â Sometime the person doing this will not ask questions because they will either be chastised or worse the designer thinks they know how to do everything. Â Other times this person can’t ask because the other designer wishes to hoard their information. Â Can we please can an intervention?